{"product_id":"insulin-receptor-antibody-insr-bha17105858","title":"Insulin Receptor Antibody \/ INSR","description":"\u003ch2\u003eOverview\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eInsulin Receptor Antibody \/ INSR is a research-use-only Rabbit polyclonal (rabbit origin) Rabbit IgG directed against \u003cstrong\u003eInsulin Receptor \/ INSR\u003c\/strong\u003e. It is supplied for interpretation-focused detection and comparative profiling in WB. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eKey elements and design rationale\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eTarget context:\u003c\/strong\u003e This antibody is raised against \u003cem\u003eAmino acids 38-76 (MDIRNNLTRLHELENCSVIEGHLQILLMFKTRPEDFRDL) from the human protein were used as the immunogen for the Insulin Receptor antibody.\u003c\/em\u003e. Epitope context matters because isoforms, processing, and post-translational modifications can change what is accessible in a given assay.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eFormat:\u003c\/strong\u003e Antigen affinity purified. Format influences background and compatibility with different detection chemistries; conjugated formats (when present) can simplify multiplexing and reduce reliance on secondary reagents.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eSpecies reactivity:\u003c\/strong\u003e Human, Rat. Cross-species performance can vary with sequence divergence and epitope conservation, so interpretation should be anchored with appropriate biological controls.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eApplications:\u003c\/strong\u003e WB. These indicate assay contexts where the antibody is commonly applied; actual performance depends on sample type and processing.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eLimitations:\u003c\/strong\u003e This Insulin Receptor antibody is available for research use only.. Consider these constraints when selecting controls and when comparing results across sample matrices.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003ePolyclonal reagents can differ in how they recognize epitope features. Monoclonal antibodies often provide more consistent epitope targeting across lots, while polyclonal preparations may broaden recognition across related epitope variants. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eBiological background\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInsulin Receptor \/ INSR\u003c\/strong\u003e refers to the gene\/protein target stated in the product record. Protein targets can exhibit context-dependent expression, regulated turnover, isoform diversity, and post-translational modifications that affect apparent molecular weight and epitope accessibility. For curated functional annotation, sequence features, and expression context, consult \u003ca href=\"https:\/\/www.uniprot.org\/uniprotkb\/P06213\/entry\"\u003eUniProtKB P06213\u003c\/a\u003e, \u003ca href=\"https:\/\/www.ensembl.org\/\"\u003eEnsembl\u003c\/a\u003e, and \u003ca href=\"https:\/\/www.proteinatlas.org\/\"\u003eHuman Protein Atlas\u003c\/a\u003e.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eResearch relevance and current trends\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIntegrating antibody-based detection with single-cell and spatial atlasing efforts to connect RNA programs with protein-level abundance and localization in defined cell states.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExpanding multiplexed imaging and high-content screening, where reagent specificity, cross-reactivity risk, and channel design (including direct conjugates) become central to interpretation.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGrowing emphasis on reproducibility and application-specific validation frameworks (e.g., genetic perturbation controls, orthogonal measurements, and independent antibody strategies) when drawing mechanistic conclusions.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eCommon research applications\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eWestern blot (WB):\u003c\/strong\u003e commonly used to compare relative abundance\/size (e.g., band intensity or mobility shifts) between conditions.\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003eInterpretation typically focuses on relative differences (presence\/absence, fold-changes, compartment shifts, or population-level shifts) rather than absolute quantitation. When signal changes are observed, they may reflect altered expression, altered localization\/trafficking, changes in modification state, or differences in sample composition; orthogonal readouts and appropriate controls help distinguish these possibilities.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eApplication details (record-specific):\u003c\/strong\u003e Western blot: 0.5-1ug\/ml\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eApplication notes (record-specific):\u003c\/strong\u003e Differences in protocols and secondary\/substrate sensitivity may require the Insulin Receptor antibody to be titrated for optimal performance.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eNotes for experimental interpretation\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eProduct description (record-specific):\u003c\/strong\u003e Insulin receptor is a tetramer of 2 alpha and 2 beta subunits that are coded by a single gene and are joined by disulfide bonds, a mechanism parallel to that of its ligand, insulin. It belongs to the large class of tyrosine kinase receptors. The insulin receptor gene is mapped to 19p13.2. The insulin receptor mediates their activity by causing the addition of a phosphate group to particular tyrosines on certain proteins within a cell. The INSR gene spans more than 120 kb and has 22 exons. Functional studies of the INSR SNPs show no effect on mRNA levels or splicing in peripheral blood leukocytes or on binding of insulin to mononuclear cells.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003ePotential confounders:\u003c\/strong\u003e isoforms, proteolytic processing, and PTMs can change epitope presentation and apparent size; fixation\/denaturation state can also expose or mask epitopes. Species differences near the epitope may affect cross-reactivity.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eControl concepts:\u003c\/strong\u003e include genetic perturbation (KO\/KD) or overexpression comparisons, orthogonal measurement (e.g., transcript or proteomics), and independent antibody\/epitope strategies. For conjugated reagents, include staining-only\/background controls appropriate to the detection chemistry.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eImmunogen\/epitope context is described as: \u003cem\u003eAmino acids 38-76 (MDIRNNLTRLHELENCSVIEGHLQILLMFKTRPEDFRDL) from the human protein were used as the immunogen for the Insulin Receptor antibody.\u003c\/em\u003e. Monoclonal and polyclonal formats differ in epitope breadth; this can influence sensitivity to sequence variants, isoforms, or PTM-dependent recognition.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c!-- Sources (internal):\n- UniProtKB entry P06213 (UniProt Consortium): https:\/\/www.uniprot.org\/uniprotkb\/P06213\/entry\n- Ensembl genome browser (EMBL-EBI \/ Wellcome Sanger): https:\/\/www.ensembl.org\/\n- The Human Protein Atlas (KTH \/ SciLifeLab): https:\/\/www.proteinatlas.org\/\n- A proposal for validation of antibodies (Uhlén et al., Nature Methods, 2016): https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/nmeth.3995.pdf\n- Getting to reproducible antibodies: the rationale for sequenced recombinant characterized reagents (Bradbury \u0026 Plückthun, PEDS, 2015): https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/peds\/article\/28\/10\/303\/1478378\n- Standardize antibodies used in research (Bradbury, Plückthun et al., Nature, 2015): https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/518027a.pdf\n--\u003e","brand":"NSJ Bioreagents","offers":[{"title":"0.5mg\/ml if reconstituted with 0.2ml sterile DI water \/ 100 ug","offer_id":53210380108141,"sku":"R32540","price":462.47,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0949\/7424\/7277\/files\/get_image_6d41350e-bbb1-4f28-8128-7794f6403fe0.jpg?v=1775785765","url":"https:\/\/www.ebiohippo.com\/products\/insulin-receptor-antibody-insr-bha17105858","provider":"BioHippo","version":"1.0","type":"link"}