Human Dopaminergic Neurons (iPSC-derived, CHCHD2, R145Q, ISO)

Overview

Human Dopaminergic Neurons (iPSC-derived, CHCHD2, R145Q, ISO) is a cell model used for research applications where physiologically relevant identity and donor background support interpretation of experimental readouts. Human Neural associated with Parkinson's Disease within the Nervous system.

Midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons are critical for directing fundamental brain functions such voluntary movement, reward processing, and working memory. The substantia nigra (SN) and the ventral tegmental area (VTA) have the highest populations of DA neurons in the midbrain. The degeneration of DA neurons within the pars compacta region of the SN is a pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and Lewy body dementia (LBD) [1] . For many years, powerful experimental model organisms like the mouse, fruit fly, and baker’s yeast have been used to study neurodegenerative diseases, providing insights into disease mechanisms like pathological aggregation of key proteins, the nature and processes of neuronal damage, the role of genetic determinants, and the contribution of neuroinflammation in fueling neuronal loss [2,3] . However, it appears that the use of these models has only partially elucidated some elements of the illnesses, impeding a meaningful translation into new treatments, diagnostics, and prevention.

Key elements and design rationale

• Cell identity: Neural (iPSC-Derived Cells)
• Source context: Dopaminergic Neurons; Nervous
• Donor background: Disease/condition: Parkinson's Disease
• Biosafety level: BSL-2 (follow your institution’s biosafety program and local regulations)

Product-specific elements (such as tissue source, donor background, and cell classification) help frame how results should be interpreted across assays and experimental conditions.

Biological background

Neural and glial cell models support studies of neuronal signaling, synaptic biology, neuroinflammation, and cell-type–specific responses to injury or disease-relevant stimuli.

Across primary and specialty cell models, experimental outcomes can be influenced by donor heterogeneity, passage history, confluence, and media composition. For interpretation, it is common to validate key markers or functional phenotypes in the user’s assay context and to document culture variables consistently.

Research relevance and current trends

• Increasing use of primary and specialty cells to improve translational relevance for target biology and phenotypic screening.
• Adoption of 3D culture formats and co-culture systems to better capture tissue microenvironments and cell–cell interactions.
• Integration of functional readouts with single-cell and multi-omics profiling to connect phenotype with molecular state.
• Growth of human-relevant neural models (including glial components) to study circuit- and inflammation-linked phenotypes.

Common research applications

• Profile identity markers by flow cytometry or immunostaining in cultured cells
• Quantify neurite outgrowth and synaptic marker profiles in neural cultures
• Quantify functional responses to defined stimuli relevant to the model system
• Compare baseline phenotype across donors/conditions using gene expression profiling
• Measure neuroinflammatory signaling in neuron–glia or microglia-enriched models

Interpretation typically focuses on how a perturbation (e.g., cytokine exposure, metabolic stress, genetic manipulation, or compound treatment) shifts marker profiles or functional readouts relative to an appropriate control matched for donor and culture variables.

Notes for experimental interpretation

• Donor-to-donor heterogeneity can influence baseline phenotype and treatment response; include biological replicates when feasible.
• Passage number, confluence, and media composition can shift gene expression and functional readouts; track and report these variables consistently.
• Contamination control (including routine mycoplasma monitoring) supports reproducibility in downstream assays.
• Use appropriate negative/positive controls for the readout (e.g., unstimulated controls, pathway agonists/antagonists) to contextualize observed changes.

SKU:BHC18500311

Customization & Add-ons: Can't find the cell line you need—or require a custom cell-based solution for your project? We can help you source the best match or support custom cell line services for diverse research needs, including cell line sourcing and selection (species, tissue, and disease model matching), stable cell line engineering (overexpression, knockdown, or knockout via CRISPR/Cas9, shRNA, or sgRNA), reporter gene integration (GFP, RFP, luciferase, and other fluorescent or bioluminescent constructs), genome editing and knockin (point mutations, tagged endogenous proteins, conditional alleles), inducible expression systems (Tet-On/Off and other regulatable constructs), drug resistance marker selection (puromycin, G418, hygromycin, and others), custom growth and media optimisation for specific assay requirements, scale-up production for high-throughput screening campaigns, and authentication and QC services (STR profiling, mycoplasma testing, viability assessment). Click Talk to a Scientist to submit a request, email us at support@biohippo.com, or explore our Research Services for additional support—our team will follow up with feasibility details and next steps.