| Field | Specification |
|---|---|
| Mfr No | |
| Alternative Names | Myeloperoxidase;MPO;1.11.2.2;Myeloperoxidase;89 kDa myeloperoxidase;84 kDa myeloperoxidase;Myeloperoxidase light chain;Myeloperoxidase heavy chain;MPO; |
| Assay Time | |
| Assay Type | |
| Detection Range | |
| Expression System | |
| Gene ID | |
| Immunogen | Expression system for standard: NS0; Immunogen sequence: A49-S745 |
| Product Type | |
| Reactivity | |
| Sample Type(s) | cell culture supernatants, cell lysate, serum, plasma (heparin, EDTA) , saliva and urine. |
| Sensitivity | |
| Storage | |
| Target | |
| UniProt # |
Background
Also known as: Myeloperoxidase, MPO, 1.11.2.2, 89 kDa myeloperoxidase, 84 kDa myeloperoxidase, Myeloperoxidase light chain, Myeloperoxidase heavy chain.
Human MPO/Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is an established target in many assay panels, supporting hypothesis testing across diverse biological systems. This target is frequently investigated in Molecular & Cellular Biology research contexts. This analyte is often discussed in the context of metabolic and signaling biochemistry. Enzymes shape pathway flux and signaling output by catalyzing reactions that control metabolites, second messengers, or post-translational modifications.
Biological context
In experimental systems, protein abundance can reflect regulated expression, secretion, processing, or clearance. Interpreting changes benefits from considering compartment (cell-associated vs soluble), the time scale of regulation, and whether complexes or modified forms contribute to the measured signal.
Why it matters in research
- Systems-level readout: Quantification supports comparisons across conditions, time points, and treatment groups.
- Mechanistic interpretation: Pairing with upstream regulators and downstream markers helps contextualize changes.
- Biomarker-style profiling: Measuring panels of related analytes can improve interpretability in complex models.
Sample data
| Concentration (ng/ml) | 0 | 0.312 | 0.62 | 1.25 | 2.5 | 5 | 10 | 20 |
| O.D. | 0.015 | 0.117 | 0.2211 | 0.3838 | 0.6726 | 1.234 | 2.0 | 2.861 |
Intra/inter assay consistency
| Intra-Assay Precision | Inter-Assay Precision | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| n | 16 | 16 | 16 | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Mean (pg/ml) | 580 | 2272 | 9558 | 587 | 2421 | 9230 |
| Standard deviation | 42.92 | 154.49 | 401.43 | 48.13 | 191.25 | 507.65 |
| CV (%) | 7.4% | 6.8% | 4.2% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 5.5% |
Kit components
Description|Quantity Pre-coated 96-well strip microplate|1 Standard|2 vials Biotinylated antibody (100x)|100ul Avidin-Biotin-Peroxidase Complex (100x)|100ul Sample Diluent|30ml Antibody Diluent|12ml Avidin-Biotin-Peroxidase Diluent|12ml Color Developing Reagent (TMB)|10ml Stop Solution|10ml Wash Buffer (25x)|20ml Adhesive plate sealers|4Materials required but not provided
- Microplate Reader capable of reading absorbance at 450nm.
- Incubator.
- Automated plate washer (optional).
- Pipettes and pipette tips capable of precisely dispensing 0.5 µl through 1 ml volumes of aqueous solutions.
- Multichannel pipettes are recommended for large amount of samples.
- Deionized or distilled water.
- 500ml graduated cylinders.
- Test tubes for dilution.
►How many samples can I run per plate?
►What sample dilution should I use?
►Why is my signal weak or absent?
►Why is my background signal high?
►Are the kit components sterile?
►How do I analyze my ELISA results?
►How should I store samples before running the assay?
►What positive and negative controls should I include?
Can’t Find What You’re Looking For? We can help you source the best match or customize an ELISA solution for your study. Options may include alternative target synonyms, different species reactivity, sample type/matrix compatibility (serum/plasma/lysate/supernatant), assay format (sandwich/competitive), sensitivity/range, detection chemistry (colorimetric/fluorescent/chemiluminescent), plate format (pre-coated/uncoated, strips vs full plate), and bulk or custom packaging. Click Talk to a Scientist to submit a request form, email us at support@biohippo.com, or explore our Research Services for additional support. Our team will be in contact with you shortly.
- Shen et al. (2025). The clinic application of mNGS and ENA-78 assays to identify intra-amniotic infection/inflammation. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.
- Trentini et al. (2024). PON1 and PON3 in Alzheimer’s Disease: Similar Functions but Different Roles. Antioxidants.
- Xie et al. (2023). Neutrophil extracellular traps in relationship to efficacy of systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Medicine.
- Shen et al. (2021). Mechanism of neutrophil extracellular traps generation and their role in trophoblasts apoptosis in gestational diabetes …. CELLULAR SIGNALLING.
- A. et al. (2016). The Burkholderia cenocepacia OmpA-like protein BCAL2958: identification, characterization, and detection of anti-BCAL295…. AMB Express.
- Wang et al. (2016). Distinct mucosal immunopathologic profiles in atopic and nonatopic chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps in Centra…. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology.
- Baydin et al. (2016). Pentraxin 3, ischemia-modified albumin, and myeloperoxidase in predicting a cardiac damage in acute carbon monoxide pois…. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE.
- Fu et al. (2015). Bradykinin inhibits oxidative stress-induced senescence of endothelial progenitor cells through the B2R/AKT/RB and B2R/E…. Oncotarget.
- Baydin et al. (2014). Ischemia-modified albumin is not better than creatine kinase-MB and cardiac troponin I in predicting a cardiac injury in…. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE.