| Field | Specification |
|---|---|
| Mfr No | |
| Clonality | |
| Host | |
| Immunogen | Amino acids E189-E287 from the human protein were used as the immunogen for the SRCIN1 antibody. |
| Isotype | |
| Product Type | |
| Purity | |
| Reactivity | |
| Storage | |
| Target | |
| UniProt # |
Overview
SRCIN1 Antibody is a research-use antibody directed against SRCIN1. It is supplied for use in common immunoassay contexts such as WB, IHC-P, FACS, Direct ELISA (RUO).
Key elements and design rationale
- Target: SRCIN1.
- Description (provided): Using yeast 2-hybrid analysis, protein pull-down assays, and mutation analysis, it is showed that the first coiled-coil domain of rat Snip interacted with the N-terminal t-SNARE domain of Snap25 (600322).
- Antibody type: Rabbit, Polyclonal (rabbit origin), Rabbit IgG.
- Format: Antigen affinity purified; Antigen affinity purified.
- Reported/predicted localization: Cytoplasm, plasma membrane.
- Species reactivity: tested: Human, Mouse, Rat.
- Immunogen (if provided): Amino acids E189-E287 from the human protein were used as the immunogen for the SRCIN1 antibody..
The information above helps you match the antibody format to your assay context, interpret species-dependent differences, and anticipate how epitope context (isoforms, PTMs, or conformational state) may influence signal.
Biological background
Using yeast 2-hybrid analysis, protein pull-down assays, and mutation analysis, it is showed that the first coiled-coil domain of rat Snip interacted with the N-terminal t-SNARE domain of Snap25 (600322). Biochemical studies demonstrated that Snip was tightly associated with rat brain cytoskeleton. Indirect immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy of rat PC12 pheochromocytoma cells revealed colocalization of Snip with Snap25 in the actin cytoskeleton, particularly in filopodia, lamellipodia, and neuritic extensions, including the tips. Overexpression of Snip or its Snap25-interacting domain inhibited calcium-dependent exocytosis from PC12 cells. It is concluded that SNIP is involved in regulation of neurosecretion, perhaps via its interaction with SNAP25 and the cytoskeleton.
For curated annotations (gene/protein naming, domains, isoforms, and pathway links) for SRCIN1, consult primary databases such as UniProt, NCBI Gene, and Ensembl.
Research relevance and current trends
- Context-dependent expression studies: researchers often examine SRCIN1 abundance and localization across perturbations (genetic, pharmacologic, or environmental) to connect phenotype to molecular changes.
- Reagent reproducibility: there is growing emphasis on antibody specificity checks using orthogonal approaches (e.g., genetic perturbation or independent antibodies) and transparent reporting of clone/lot information.
- Multi-modal datasets: antibody-based readouts are increasingly combined with transcriptomics and imaging to relate protein-level measurements to cell-state transitions.
Common research applications
- Western blotting (immunoblot) for relative detection of target protein abundance and apparent molecular weight.
- Immunohistochemistry for spatial mapping of target expression across tissues and cell types.
- FACS: commonly used to detect or compare SRCIN1 across experimental conditions (conceptual guidance only).
- Direct ELISA: commonly used to detect or compare SRCIN1 across experimental conditions (conceptual guidance only).
When comparing conditions, interpret changes in signal in the context of sample composition, expected localization, and any known isoform complexity for the target.
Notes for experimental interpretation
- Isoforms and PTMs: alternative splicing or post-translational modifications can change epitope accessibility and apparent molecular weight; interpret bands/signals accordingly.
- Cross-reactivity and matrix effects: background binding can vary by sample type, species, and blocking/detection chemistries; include appropriate negative controls.
- Control concepts: where feasible, use genetic perturbation (KO/KD/overexpression), orthogonal assays, or independent antibodies to support specificity claims.
Antibody considerations: Polyclonal reagents may recognize multiple epitopes and can increase sensitivity but may show broader binding profiles, while monoclonal clones provide a single-epitope readout that can improve consistency across experiments. If a conjugate is listed, the antibody supports more direct detection workflows; otherwise, it is typically used with a compatible secondary antibody.
Customization & Add-ons: Can’t find the antibody you need—or require a custom format for your assay? We can help you source the best match or support custom antibody solutions for diverse research needs, including species and isotype selection, conjugations and labeling (e.g., HRP/AP, biotin, fluorophores), purification grade options (Protein A/G, affinity purified), formulation preferences (buffer selection, carrier-free, glycerol-free), custom concentrations and aliquoting, low-endotoxin options for cell-based work, and application-focused QC/validation support (project dependent). Click Talk to a Scientist to submit a request, email us at support@biohippo.com, or explore our Research Services for additional support—our team will follow up with feasibility details and next steps.